Impact of Job Complexity and Performance on CFO Compensation

Jeff Boone, Inder Khurana and K.K. Raman
Additional contact information
Jeff Boone: The University of Texas at San Antonio
Inder Khurana: University of Missouri-Columbia
K.K. Raman: University of North Texas

No 98, Working Papers from College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio

Abstract: Prior research suggests that Big 4 auditors provide higher quality audits by virtue of their large size. Still, the recent reforms mandated by the Sarbanes Oxley Act – by increasing client and auditor incentives for accurate reporting – may have narrowed audit quality differences across auditor groups. In this paper, we examine audit quality for Big 4 and Mid-tier auditors during 2003-06 and include clients of other smaller audit firms for comparison purposes. We examine actual audit quality (as proxied by earnings management metrics) as well as perceived audit quality (as proxied by the client- and year-specific eloading and ex ante equity risk premium metrics). We include in our analysis only those Big 4 clients for whom the Mid-tier firms are potentially viable as auditors. Relative to other smaller audit firm clients, we find Big 4 and Mid-tier audit clients to have (1) lower levels of accrual management, (2) higher levels of real earnings management, and (3) higher levels of investor-perceived accruals quality. In each case, we were unable to reject the null that Big 4 and Mid-tier audits are similar. However, we find Big 4 audit clients to have a lower client-specific ex ante equity risk premium relative to both Mid-tier and other smaller audit firm clients. Collectively, our findings indicate that in situations where a Mid-tier auditor is potentially viable, Big 4 clients could utilize a Mid-tier firm without adversely affecting audit quality. Still, the results suggest that Big 4 clients have a lower ex ante cost of equity capital which is likely related to the insurance considerations (“deep pockets”) – rather than the audit quality -- associated with having a Big 4 auditor.

Keywords: Auditor concentration; Audit quality; Earnings management; Cost of equity capital. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2009-06-29
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://interim.business.utsa.edu/wps/acc/0098ACC-427-2009.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tsa:wpaper:00126acc

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wendy Frost ().