Social preferences or sacred values? Theroy and evidence of deontological motivations

Daniel Chen and Martin Schonger

No 16-59, IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST)

Abstract: Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where a decision-maker not only takes into consideration her own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where a decision-maker makes her choice not only based on the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se have been rare. We propose an experimental method that can detect an individual’s deontological motivations by varying the probability of the decision-maker’s decision having consequences. It uses two states of the world, one where the decision has consequences and one where it has none. We show that a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance will choose the decision that leads to the best consequences regardless of the probability of the consequential state. A purely deontological decision-maker is also invariant to the probability. However, a mixed consequentialist-deontological decision-maker’s choice changes with the probability. The direction of change gives insight into the location of the optimand for one’s duty. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to detect deontological motivations and discuss the relevance of the theory and method for economics and law.

Keywords: Consequentialism; deontological motivations; normative commitments; social preferences; revealed preference; decision theory; first order stochastic dominance; random lottery incentive method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-evo, nep-exp and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://iast.fr/pub/31140
http://users.nber.org/~dlchen/papers/Social_Prefer ... _ScienceAdvances.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:iastwp:31140

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().