When Economists Disagree: Beliefs, Values, and Policy endorsements

Christian Gollier, Karine Van der Straeten and Jiakun Zheng

No 26-1799, TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE)

Abstract: Economists frequently take opposing positions in public policy debates. To investigate the respective roles of beliefs about how the economy works and normative values in these disagreements, we survey academic economists who publicly took opposing positions on the economic program of the Nouveau Front Populaire, a broad left-wing electoral alliance, during the 2024 French legislative campaign. We elicit their beliefs about inequality and the cost of redistribution, and measure their inequality aversion through a leaky-bucket task. We find substantial differences between endorsers and non-endorsers in both beliefs and distributive preferences. Moreover, beliefs and inequality aversion are strongly correlated, substantially more so than in a representative sample of the French population. Both dimensions help account for economists’ policy positions. Our findings suggest that economists’ policy disagreements involve both empirical assessments and normative values, and that these two dimensions are themselves closely intertwined.

Keywords: Economists’ policy positions; Efficiency; Inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D81 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/docu ... ment/wp_tse_1799.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:wpaper:132341

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().