Environmental Enforcement and Compliance: Lessons from Pollution, Safety, and Tax Settings
James Alm () and
Jay Shimshack
No 1409, Working Papers from Tulane University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Environmental monitoring and enforcement are controversial and incompletely understood. This survey reviews what we do and do not know about the overall effectiveness, as well as the cost effectiveness, of pollution monitoring and enforcement. We ask five key questions: What do environmental monitoring and enforcement actions look like in the real world? How do we assess environmental compliance and deterrence? Do environmental monitoring and enforcement actions get results? How, why, and when do inspections and sanctions achieve compliance and reduce pollution? And, what do the answers to the preceding questions tell us about designing and implementing more effective and more cost effective public policies for the environment? A key contribution is drawing lessons from diverse sources, including insights from theoretical, empirical, and experimental contributions in environmental, tax, and safety settings. We conclude that traditional environmental monitoring and enforcement actions generate important deterrence effects. However, there are limits to such deterrence, and deterrence itself cannot fully explain all patterns of environmental behavior. Encouraging compliance requires both traditional tools and additional tools.
Keywords: environmental economics; enforcement and compliance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H26 K32 Q50 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.tulane.edu/RePEc/pdf/tul1409.pdf First Version, October 2014 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Environmental Enforcement and Compliance: Lessons from Pollution, Safety, and Tax Settings (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tul:wpaper:1409
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Tulane University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kerui Geng ().