Derterminants and consequences of the stringency of environmental policies: an empirical test
Isabelle Cadoret and
Fabio Padovano
Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS from Condorcet Center for political Economy
Abstract:
Public choice models of environmental policies suggest that governments arbitrage between the conflicting interests of consumers/voters and of producers organized in lobbies. Governments minimize the political costs of environmental policies by approving those that voters demand without pushing for their implementation, to save cost increases to producers. Environmental policies thus become far reaching but not “stringent”. This paper empirically examines four testable hypotheses stemming from the literature on the arbitrage hypothesis on a sample of 20 OECD countries for the period 1995-2012, using a new set of proxies of the stringency of market and non-market based policies that overcome the shortcomings of proxying the stringency of policy instruments by looking at policy results. The estimates obtained through a system of simultaneous equations show that greater stringency, regardless of the policy type, appears to reduce energy intensity, confirming that governments’ political interest to arbitrage depends on the industry’s value added, the level of public sector’s corruption, the quality of governance and on the urbanization rate.
Keywords: Environmental policy stringency; energy intensity; political arbitrage; regulatory quality; corruption; voters; special interest groups (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D78 H23 Q52 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ged.univ-rennes1.fr/nuxeo/site/esupversion ... bc-92fc-e5f80f6b654e (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tut:cccrwp:2018-04-ccr
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
CREM (UMR CNRS 6211) - Faculty of Economics, 7 place Hoche, 35065 Rennes Cedex - France
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS from Condorcet Center for political Economy CREM (UMR CNRS 6211) – Faculty of Economics, 7 place Hoche, 35065 RENNES Cedex. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by GERMAIN Lucie ().