Why Is Belief-Action Consistency so Low? The Role of Belief Uncertainty

Irenaeus Wolff and Dominik Folli

No 130, TWI Research Paper Series from Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz

Abstract: Experimental research typically shows that best-response rates are below what plausible error rates would suggest. We experimentally test the conjecture that observed action-belief inconsistencies are related to belief uncertainty. We rely on a belief-sampling model that has been highly successful in explaining behaviour in multi-armed bandit problems and aggregate outcomes in games, markets, and surveys. Our data shows that inducing higher belief uncertainty leads more frequently to choices that are inconsistent with stated beliefs and---in an experiment directly testing the mechanism---to stochastic belief reports. The uncertainty-inconsistency relationship continues to hold when we control for error costs econometrically in several ways.

Keywords: Best Response; Belief Elicitation; Discoordination Game; Knightian Uncertainty; Errors; Elusive Beliefs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.twi-kreuzlingen.ch/wp-content/uploads/ ... -130-wolff-folli.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Why is belief–action consistency so low? The role of belief uncertainty (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:twi:respas:0130

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in TWI Research Paper Series from Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Urs Fischbacher ().