Intensity Targeting or Emission CAPS: Non-Cooperative Climate Change Policies and Technological Change

Georg M ller-F Rstenberger and Gunter Stephan

Diskussionsschriften from Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft

Abstract: This paper analyses costs and benefits of three different post-Kyoto policy options: On the one hand there is PARETO which is the nickname for the pareto-efficient internationalization of the external effects of global climate change through trading carbon emission rights on open global markets. And there is QCAP as well as ICAP on the other. Both are unilateral climate policies. QCAP denotes a scenario where regions aim for reducing domestic carbon emissions by a certain percentage annually. ICAP is a short cut for intensity targeting which is the US' most preferred climate policy option. In a world without uncertainty about future GDP and carbon dioxide emissions it refers to the same abatement policy, however by means of technological progress only

Keywords: Climate policy; intensity targeting; R&D investments; Integrated Assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O33 Q38 Q43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-ene, nep-env, nep-res and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.vwiit.ch/dp/dp0502.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ube:dpvwib:dp0502

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Diskussionsschriften from Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Franz Koelliker ().