EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Effectiveness of Leniency Programs when Firms choose the Degree of Collusion

Winand Emons ()

Diskussionsschriften from Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft

Abstract: An antitrust authority deters collusion using nes and a leniency program. It chooses the probability of an investigation. Firms pick the degree of collusion: The more they collude, the higher are pro ts, but so is the probability of detection. Firms thus trade-o higher pro ts against higher expected nes. If rms are suciently patient, leniency is ine ective; it may even increase collusion. Increasing the probability of an investigation at low levels does not increase deterrence. Increasing the probability of an investigation at high levels reduces collusion, yet never completely.

Keywords: antitrust; cartels; deterrence; leniency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D43 K21 K42 L40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-ind and nep-law
Date: 2018-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vwl.unibe.ch/wp-content/uploads/papers/dp/dp1816.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Effectiveness of Leniency Programs when Firms choose the Degree of Collusion (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ube:dpvwib:dp1816

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Diskussionsschriften from Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Silvia Glusstein-Gerber (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .

 
Page updated 2019-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ube:dpvwib:dp1816