On a dubious theory of cross-country differences in intelligence

Kevin Denny

No 200931, Working Papers from Geary Institute, University College Dublin

Abstract: Kanazawa (2007) offers an explanation for the variation across countries of average intelligence. It is based on the idea human intelligence is a domain specific adaptation and that both temperature and the distance from some putative point of origin are proxies for the degree of novelty that humans in a country have experienced. However the argument ignores many other considerations and is a priori weak and the data used questionable. A particular problem is that in calculating distances between countries it implicitly assumes that the earth is flat. This makes all the estimates biased and unreliable.

Keywords: intelligence; measurement error; international comparisons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2009-10-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-neu
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp200931.pdf First version, 2009 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: On a dubious theory of cross-country differences in intelligence (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucd:wpaper:200931

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Geary Institute, University College Dublin Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geary Tech ().