Reply to Tracy Dennison and Sheilagh Ogilvie: The European Marriage pattern and the Little Divergence
Alexandra de Pleijt (),
Jan Luiten van Zanden and
Tine De Moor
No 70, Working Papers from Utrecht University, Centre for Global Economic History
This reply reviews the evidence presented by Dennison and Ogilvie that the European Marriage Pattern did not contribute to economic growth in Early Modern Europe (EMP). First, we argue that the link between the EMP and economic growth is not conceptualized correctly. Age of marriage is not a correct index of the degree to which countries were characterized by EMP. Secondly, we show that our alternative interpretation of the EMP, focusing on the underlying institutions and the related balance of power between men and women, solves this problem. We find a strong correlation between economic growth and female agency.
Keywords: Marriage patterns; Economic growth; Institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gro and nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucg:wpaper:0070
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Utrecht University, Centre for Global Economic History University of Utrecht, Drift 10, The Netherlands. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Carmichael ().