Economic History: ‘An Isthmus Joining Two Great Continents’?

Cormac Ó Gráda

No 202001, Working Papers from School of Economics, University College Dublin

Abstract: This paper offers (yet another) reflection on the history and current status of economic history. No other sub-discipline of economics or history has tried so hard to be loved as economic history. That love is unrequited, because economic history’s problem is existential: it is an inherently interdisciplinary field. Economists and historians are interested in only small parts of what economic history should embrace. Some examples are given of how narrow views of the past the impoverish research. Not all is gloom and doom, however. The controversies economic history provokes and the insights it provides touch on issues that resonate and that will continue to do so.

Keywords: Economic history; Cliometrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52 pages
Date: 2020-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11270 First version, 2020 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Economic History: «An Isthmus Joining Two Great Continents»? (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucn:wpaper:202001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from School of Economics, University College Dublin Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicolas Clifton ().