Economics at your fingertips  

Is the Bayesian Approach Necessarily Better than the Classical Approach in Unit-Root Test?

Francis Ahking ()

No 2002-18, Working papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Economics

Abstract: Some researchers, for example, Koop (1992), and Sims (1988), advocated for Bayesian alternatives to unit-root testing over the classical approach using the augmented Dickey-Fuller test (ADF). This paper studies what Koop (1992) called the 'Objective' Bayesian approach to unit-root testing. We apply the 'objective' Bayesian unit-root test to a study of long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) for the post-Bretton Woods era. While the classical approach using the ADF test cannot reject the unit-root hypothesis, the Bayesian approach, on the other hand, suggests that the unit-root hypothesis is not strongly supported by the sample data. Rather, the trend-stationary hypothesis receives the highest posterior probability in all cases except for the Japanese yen/German mark real exchange rate where the stationary hypothesis receives the highest posterior probability. In two Monte Carlo simulations, however, we find that the 'objective' Bayesian test have relatively low power in distinguishing between plausible alternatives, making it difficult to draw any conclusions concerning long-run PPP. We conclude that, at least for the 'objective' Bayesian test, the Bayesian approach is not necessary better than the classical ADF approach.

JEL-codes: C22 F31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2002
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-ets, nep-net and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Economics University of Connecticut 365 Fairfield Way, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark McConnel ().

Page updated 2023-11-28
Handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:2002-18