Are there differences between perception of corruption at public and private sector? A multi-country analysis
Giorgina Piani (),
Natalia Melgar and
Maximo Rossi ()
Additional contact information
Natalia Melgar: Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República
No 109, Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) from Department of Economics - dECON
If we accept that the concept of corruption is influenced by culture and personal values then, we should ask: 1) what are the individual characteristics that shape corruption perception? 2) how important is the incidence of the country of residence in determining it? and 3) is there a relationship between private and public perception of corruption? The database is the 2007 GALLUP Public Opinion Survey; our dataset includes 78 countries and more than 57,000 observations and we estimated probit models. Our main conclusions are that some individual characteristics shape corruption perception (gender, age, marital status, the number of children, religion and religiosity). Moreover, country characteristics also matters. In particular, we find that Gross Domestic Product per capita and inequality play a relevant role. Finally, we also find that perception of corruption at public sector is highly correlated with perception of corruption at private sector.
Keywords: corruption; microeconomic behavior; cross-country comparative research. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 K42 O57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://cienciassociales.edu.uy/departamentodeecono ... 13/archivos/0109.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://cienciassociales.edu.uy/departamentodeeconomia/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/archivos/0109.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://cienciassociales.edu.uy/departamentodeeconomia/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/archivos/0109.pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ude:wpaper:0109
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) from Department of Economics - dECON Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrea Doneschi () and Romina Quagliotti ().