 The Costs of Sovereign Defaults:Theory and Empirical EvidenceBusiness School Working Papers from Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Abstract: Economic policy makers sometimes perceive a sovereign default as a jump into the unkown.The main piece of information missing is what the costs of the default are going to be. Assessing them correctly is crucial to evaluate how far a country should go to avoid a default. This paper analyzes the main potential sources of the costs of defaults discussed in the theoretical literature and evaluates the empirical evidence on the matter. I classify these potential sources in three groups: (1) sanctions imposed as penalties by creditors; (2) costs related to the information content of defaults; (3) costs related to domestic agents sovereign bond holdings, and present a simple model that captures the main intuition behind each of them. A review of the empirical evidence suggests that while costs generated in the aftermath of defaults by traditional mecha-nisms such as trade sanctions or exclusion from credit markets have not been significant in recent decades, the information revelation and the impact on domestic bond holders, particularly the banking system, seem to be the main costs of sovereign defaults. Pages: 33 pages Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:udt:wpbsdt:2015-02 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Business School Working Papers from Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.