Recurrent Debt Problems and International Safety Nets

Eduardo Levy Yeyati

Business School Working Papers from Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

Abstract: In this paper, I revisit the moral hazard arguments in order to discuss alternative approaches to the role of the IFIs. In particular, I distinguish between lender, borrower and government moral hazard, according to how the costs and benefits of IFI intervention are distributed among the relevant players, and argue that it is the latter problem that should be at the center of the debate. In this light, I analyze the consequences of alternative modus operandi of the IFIs. I conclude that both casual evidence and economic analysis suggest that an explicit international safety net, by enhancing the expected returns of good policies as perceived by the government, may create the right incentives outweighing hazard considerations and, as a result, may help reduce the incidence of recurrent debt problems.

Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mfd
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.utdt.edu/departamentos/empresarial/cif/pdfs-wp/wpcif-092004.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:udt:wpbsdt:safetynets

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Business School Working Papers from Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicolás Del Ponte ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).