Explaining Differences in the Productivity of Capital Across Countries in the Context of 'New' Growth Theory
Kevin S. Nell () and
Anthony Thirlwall ()
Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent
The purpose of this paper is to explain differences in the productivity of capital across countries taking 84 rich and poor countries over the period 1980-2011, and to test the orthodox neoclassical assumption of diminishing returns to capital. The marginal product of capital is measured as the ratio of the long-run growth of GDP to a country’s investment ratio. Twenty potential determinants are considered using a general-to-specific model selection procedure. Education, government consumption, geography, export growth, openness, political rights and macroeconomic instability turn out to be the most important variables. The data also suggest constant returns to capital, so investment matters for long-run growth.
Keywords: new growth theory; investment; productivity of capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O11 O33 O43 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff and nep-gro
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Explaining Differences in the Productivity of Capital Across Countries in the Context of ‘New’ Growth Theory (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:1412
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent School of Economics, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7FS.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tracey Girling ().