Why did socialist economies fail? The role of factor inputs reconsidered
Tamás Vonyó () and
Alexander Klein ()
Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent
We present new investment data and revised growth accounts for three socialist economies between 1950 and 1989. Government statistics reported distorted measures for both the rate and trajectory of productivity growth in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland. Researchers have benefited from revised output data, but continued to use official statistics on capital input, or estimated capital stock from official investment data. Investment levels and rates of capital accumulations were, in fact, much lower than officially claimed and over-reporting worsened over time. Sluggish factor accumulation, declining equipment investment and labor input, contributed much more to the socialist growth failure of the 1980s than previously thought.
Keywords: growth accounting; capital accumulation; Socialism; Eastern Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N14 N64 O47 P27 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hme and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Why did socialist economies fail? The role of factor inputs reconsidered (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:1708
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent School of Economics, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NP.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tracey Girling ().