Progressivity Effects of Structural Income Tax Reforms
Michael Keen (),
Harry Papapanagos () and
Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent
The theoretical analysis of tax progressivity has proceeded on the unrealistic assumption that tax liability is never zero, thereby precluding a systematic examination of the progressivity effects of such basic tax reforms as an increase in personal allowances. This paper extends the core results on progressivity to cover zero tax payments, and applies these new results to the analysis of allowances, deductions and credits. Log concavity of the tax schedule - a property quite distinct from any notion of progressivity - emerges as the critical determinant of whether liability progression rises uniformly as allowances are increased, and it is shown that any variation in average tax rates is sufficient to admit the possibility that residual progression is reduced by an increase in either allowances, income-related deductions, or tax credits.
Keywords: Progressivity; Income Tax Reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H23 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Economic Journal, 2000, 110(460), pp.50-68
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Progressivity effects of structural income tax reforms (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:9612
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Studies in Economics from School of Economics, University of Kent School of Economics, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7FS.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tracey Girling ().