Mapping discourses using Q methodology in Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia
Katherine Vande Velde,
Francisco Javier Benitez Capistros,
Jan Harold Japay,
Mohammad Nazrin Ishak,
Melissa Quispe Zuniga,
Bin Husain Mohd Lokman,
Nico Koedam and
ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
The sustainable management of natural resources requires the consideration of multiple stakeholders’ perspectives and knowledge claims, in order to inform complex and possibly contentious decision-making dilemmas. Hence, a better understanding of why people in particular contexts do manage natural resources in a particular way is needed. Focusing on mangroves, highly productive tropical intertidal forests, this study's first aim is to map the diversity of subjective viewpoints among a range of stakeholders on the management of Matang Mangrove Forest in peninsular Malaysia. Secondly, this study aims to feed the reflection on the possible consequences of the diversity of perspectives for the future management of mangroves in Malaysia and beyond. The use of the semi-quantitative Q methodology allowed us to identify three main discourses on mangrove management: i. the optimization discourse, stressing the need to improve the current overall satisfactory management regime; ii. the ’change for the better’ discourse, which focuses on increasingly participatory management and on ecotourism; and iii. the conservative ‘business as usual’ discourse. The existence of common points of connection between the discourses and their respective supporters provides opportunities for modifications of mangrove management regimes. Acknowledging this diversity of viewpoints, reflecting how different stakeholders see and talk about mangrove management, highlights the need to develop pro-active and resilient natural resource management approaches.
Keywords: Discourse; Malaysia; Mangrove management; Matang; Q methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-sea
Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in: Journal of environmental management (2016) v.183,p.988-997
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/246478
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/246478
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().