How costly is social screening? Evidence from the banking industry
Simon Cornée and
ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
Social banks screen loan applicants by using both social and financial criteria, and social screening implies an extra workload. To check the costs involved in this type of screening we use balance-sheet information on European banks, and compare the operating costs of social banks with those of other banks. Surprisingly, our first results suggest that social banks' costs are not significantly higher than those of their mainstream counterparts. Next, we uncover that the extra costs of social screening are offset by a cheaper workforce. Despite their need for specific screening, social banks are financially sustainable in a market dominated by for-profit institutions.
Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in: Economics bulletin (2018) v.38 nÂ° 1,p.532-540
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: How Costly is Social Screening? Evidence from the Banking Industry (2018)
Working Paper: How Costly is Social Screening? Evidence from the Banking Industry (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/270510
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/270510
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().