Overview of current regional and local scale air quality modelling practices: Assessment and planning tools in the EU
P. Thunis,
Ana Isabel A A. Miranda,
Jose J.M. Baldasano,
Nadège N.M. Blond,
John Douros,
Arno Graff,
Stijn Janssen,
Katarzyna Juda-Rezler,
Niko Karvosenoja,
Giuseppe Maffeis,
Alberto Martilli,
Michèle Rasoloharimahefa-Rasamoela,
E. Real,
Peter Viaene,
Marialuisa Volta and
Les L.E. White
ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
Abstract:
The 2008 European Air Quality Directive (AQD) (2008/50/EC) encourages the use of models in combination with monitoring in a range of applications. It also requires Member States to design appropriate air quality plans for zones where the air quality does not comply with the AQD limit values. In order to cope with these various elements, a wide range of different modeling methods have been developed and applied by EU Member States in the last decade to assess the effects of local and regional emission abatement policy options on air quality and human health. However, an overall review of the methodologies that are used in different countries to compile local and regional air quality plans has not been performed so far. Such a review has been the objective of the APPRAISAL EU FP7 project with the main goal to identify methodologies and their limitations and to propose possible key areas to be addressed by research and innovation on the basis of this review. To fulfill these objectives, a structured online database of methodologies has been developed in collaboration with experts involved in the design of air quality plans (AQP). The current work relies on the APPRAISAL database which currently totals 59 contributions from 13 Member States. In this paper we summarize the outcome of the APPRAISAL project with respect to the review of current Integrated Assessment Modeling practices.
Keywords: Air quality directive; Air quality modeling; Air quality planning; Integrated assessment modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-11
Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Published in: Environmental science & policy (2016) v.65,p.13-21
Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/284485/4/doi_268112.pdf Full text for the whole work, or for a work part (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/284485
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/284485
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().