Low-carbon Transition Processes and their Reading of Justice: The Case of the Scenarios for a Low-Carbon Belgium

Aurore Fransolet

ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles

Abstract: Low-carbon transition processes can not only exacerbate existing social inequalities, but also create unprecedented forms of inequality. These social impacts can potentially combine and reinforce each other to create double or even triple vulnerabilities. With a view to ensuring a just transition, it is essential to consider social justice issues in the design of low-carbon strategies. The objective of the present paper is to explore whether and how low-carbon transition processes take into account these issues. It aims to identify and analyze low-carbon transition processes’ sensitivity to vulnerabilities, inequalities and adjacent social-economic fragilities. With this aim in mind, we have studied the case of the strategy towards a low-carbon Belgium. More specifically, we have carried out an analysis of existing institutional low-carbon scenarios exercises. These artifacts, which are situated at the interface between science and policy, are taken as an entry point for exploring the linkages between social and ecological objectives into low-carbon transition processes. Seven energy foresight studies carried out for Belgium were examined through a capability-based framework allowing to assess the way low-carbon scenarios address distributional, recognition and procedural justice. The analysis reveals that justice issues are hardly addressed in the exploration of low-carbon transition pathways. The potential conflicts and synergies between low-carbon strategies and social justice objectives are actually not taken into consideration – or only in a very limited way – in the scenario analyses reviewed. In the cases where these interactions are considered, we note that the analysis is often limited to distributional justice issues. Recognition and procedural justice are indeed missing in almost all the analysis – which is particularly problematic, since misrecognition and procedural injustice are not only injustices per se, but also foundations for distributional injustice. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of conducting low-carbon scenario exercises based on mixed methods acknowledging and coping with the pluralist needs, values, issues and solutions in order to ensure a just transition. In this sense, it is necessary to develop and experiment innovative participative approaches involving all the actors concerned by problem, including the ones representing the most vulnerable persons.

Keywords: Just transition; Low-carbon scenarios; Low-carbon transition; Social justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 p.
Date: 2019-10
Note: Sponsorship: Belspo
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/391575

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... lb.ac.be:2013/391575

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ULB Institutional Repository from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().