Labor Conflicts and Inefficiency of Relationship-Specific Investments: What is the Judge's Role?
Yannick Gabuthy () and
Working Papers of BETA from Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg
This paper presents a model of litigation in the context of a labor contract. The main objective of our analysis is to determine whether and under which conditions it is efficient that the judiciary arbiters a labor conflict and how the judge's decision should be made in order to be optimal. We embed this idea by considering a relationship between an employer and his worker, in which they can make (non contractible) relationship-specific investments. The optimality here refers to the best investment incentives of the parties allowing to maximize the generated surplus. We derive conclusions about the judge's behavior giving right investment incentives and determine how the division of the surplus should vary depending on several economic and social parameters.
Keywords: Labor Law; Litigation; Investment Incentives; Bargaining. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 K31 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2007-04
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers of BETA from Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().