Gender gaps in different grading systems
Catarina Ângelo and
Ana Reis ()
FEUNL Working Paper Series from Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia
This paper analyses the impact of grading practices on the gender gap in student achievement. We examine the gender difference in the difference between teacher grading and scores on national exams to test whether there are gender differences associated with different grading systems. We use Portuguese data on 21 subjects across humanities and sciences for the whole population of students taking exams at the end of the 6th, 9th, 11th and 12th grades from 2007 to 2016. Results show that the difference in scores between teacher grading and exams is on average positive for boys and girls, but higher for the latter. This is verified across the whole distribution of exam scores. Thus, our results indicate that a grading system based on exams favors boys while one based on classroom evaluation favors girls. JEL codes: I21, I24,J16
Keywords: student achievement; grading practices; gender gap (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-gen and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to fesrvsd.fe.unl.pt:443 (Bad file descriptor) (http://fesrvsd.fe.unl.pt/WPFEUNL/WP2018/Wp625.pdf [302 Object moved]--> https://fesrvsd.fe.unl.pt/WPFEUNL/WP2018/Wp625.pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp625
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FEUNL Working Paper Series from Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Susana Lopes ().