The colonial origins of Civil War
Simeon Djankov () and
Marta Reynal-Querol ()
Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
The dominant hypothesis in the literature that studies conflict is that poverty is the main cause of civil wars. We instead analyze the effect of institutions on civil war, controlling for income per capita. In our set up, institutions are endogenous and colonial origins affect civil wars through their legacy on institutions. Our results indicate that institutions, proxied by the protection of property rights, rule of law and the efficiency of the legal system, are a fundamental cause of civil war. In particular, an improvement in institutions from the median value in the sample to the 75th percentile is associated with a 38 percentage points’ reduction in the incidence of civil wars. Moreover, once institutions are included as explaining civil wars, income does not have any effect on civil war, either directly or indirectly.
Keywords: Institutions; Civil wars (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-dev, nep-his and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1038.pdf Whole Paper (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upf:upfgen:1038
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().