Adopting a new religion: The case of Protestantism in 16th Century Germany

Davide Cantoni

Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Abstract: Using a rich dataset of territories and cities of the Holy Roman Empire in the 16th century, this paper investigates the determinants of adoption and diffusion of Protestantism as a state religion. A territory’s distance to Wittenberg, the city where Martin Luther taught, is a major determinant of adoption. This finding can be explained through a theory of strategic neighbourhood interactions: in an uncertain legal context, introducing the Reformation was a risky enterprise for territorial lords, and had higher prospects of success if powerful neighbouring states committed to the new faith first. The model is tested in a panel dataset featuring the dates of introduction of the Reformation.

Keywords: Protestantism; State religions; Germany; Spatial adoption of policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: N34 R38 Z12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1265.pdf Whole Paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Adopting a New Religion: The Case of Protestantism in 16th Century Germany (2015)
Journal Article: Adopting a New Religion: the Case of Protestantism in 16th Century Germany (2012)
Working Paper: Adopting a New Religion: The Case of Protestantism in 16th Century Germany (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upf:upfgen:1265

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).