Testing the descriptive performance of the rank-dependent utility in the domain of health profiles

Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpiñan () and José Luis Pinto

Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Abstract: Expected utility theory (EUT) has been challenged as a descriptive theory in many contexts. The medical decision analysis context is not an exception. Several researchers have suggested that rank dependent utility theory (RDUT) may accurately describe how people evaluate alternative medical treatments. Recent research in this domain has addressed a relevant feature of RDU models-probability weighting-but to date no direct test of this theory has been made. This paper provides a test of the main axiomatic difference between EUT and RDUT when health profiles are used as outcomes of risky treatments. Overall, EU best described the data. However, evidence on the editing and cancellation operation hypothesized in Prospect Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory was apparent in our study. we found that RDU outperformed EU in the presentation of the risky treatment pairs in which the common outcome was not obvious. The influence of framing effects on the performance of RDU and their importance as a topic for future research is discussed.

Keywords: Expected utility; health outcomes; medical decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 I11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/551.pdf Whole Paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Testing the descriptive performance of the rank-dependent utility in the domain of health profiles (2001)
Working Paper: Testing the descriptive performance of the rank-dependent utility in the domain of health profiles (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upf:upfgen:551

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).