EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What social security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian?

J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz () and Paola Profeta ()

Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Abstract: Why are Bismarckian social security systems associated with larger public pension expenditures, a smaller fraction of private pension and lower income in-equality than Beveridgean systems? These facts are puzzling for political economy theories of social security which predict that Beveridgean systems, involving intra-generational redistribution, should enjoy larger support among low-income people and thus be larger. This paper explains these features in a bidimensional political economy model. In an economy with three income groups, low-income support a large, redistributive system; middle-income favor an earning-related system, while high-income oppose any public system, since they have access to a superior saving technology, a private system. We show that, if income inequality is large, the voting majority of high-income and low-income supports a (small) Beveridgean system, and a large private pillar arises; the opposite occurs with low inequality. Additionally, when the capital market provides higher returns, a Beveridgean system is more likely to emerge.

Keywords: Political economy; public versus private social security; pensions system across european countries; income inequality; structure-induced equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H53 H55 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/633.pdf Whole Paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: What Social Security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian? (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: What Social Security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian? Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upf:upfgen:633

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2020-11-27
Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:633