What social security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian?
J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz () and
Paola Profeta ()
Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Why are Bismarckian social security systems associated with larger public pension expenditures, a smaller fraction of private pension and lower income in-equality than Beveridgean systems? These facts are puzzling for political economy theories of social security which predict that Beveridgean systems, involving intra-generational redistribution, should enjoy larger support among low-income people and thus be larger. This paper explains these features in a bidimensional political economy model. In an economy with three income groups, low-income support a large, redistributive system; middle-income favor an earning-related system, while high-income oppose any public system, since they have access to a superior saving technology, a private system. We show that, if income inequality is large, the voting majority of high-income and low-income supports a (small) Beveridgean system, and a large private pillar arises; the opposite occurs with low inequality. Additionally, when the capital market provides higher returns, a Beveridgean system is more likely to emerge.
Keywords: Political economy; public versus private social security; pensions system across european countries; income inequality; structure-induced equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H53 H55 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/633.pdf Whole Paper (application/pdf)
Working Paper: What Social Security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian? (2004)
Working Paper: What Social Security: Beveridgean or Bismarckian?
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upf:upfgen:633
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().