 Are Traditional Equivalence Scales Still Useful? A Review and A Possible AnswerFabrizio Balli () Department of Economics University of Siena from Department of Economics, University of Siena Abstract: This paper presents a critical review of how literature on parametric equivalence scales has evolved. In particular, it focus on the issue of scale identification from consumption data and the underlying theory of household behavior. Indifference scales, defined on a supposedly more reliable approach to family consumption decision (Chiappori’s collective model), are replacing traditional equivalence scales in academic research. However, the latter remains the only available tool for tackling non-constant scale patterns with respect to expenditure, a condition empirically detected in several different countries. An implication is that studies based on traditional, but expenditure independent, equivalence scales, may lead to wrong outcomes, such as a substantial understatement of poverty measures. This is a strong reason for a realignment of operationally implemented scales towards the most recent empirical results. Finally, recent findings against the use of traditional equivalence scales are discussed and some reasons to view them as inconclusive are put forward. Keywords: equivalence scales; equivalent expenditure; measured inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usi:wpaper:656 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Department of Economics University of Siena from Department of Economics, University of Siena Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.