Living with Phenylketonuria: Perspectives of Patients and Their Families

Cihan Bilginsoy, Norman Waitzman, Claire O. Leonard and Sharon L. Ernst

Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah from University of Utah, Department of Economics

Abstract: This study surveyed PKU patients and their primary caretakers to assess their current management practices, the barriers to effective management, and the potential utility of a home monitor in managing PKU. A survey instrument was mailed to caretakers of all 50 patients with PKU in Utah between the ages of 2 and 18 in 1997 (response rate: 64%). It included separate components for caretakers and patients aged 10 to 18. While there was uneven compliance with recommended practices, caretakers universally recognized the negative consequences of not adhering to the low-protein diet. There was, however, disagreement regarding such consequences among the older children surveyed. The primary obstacles cited to better adherence were time constraints and stress associated with food preparation and record-keeping, and the restrictions imposed on social life. Phe test results were regarded as the principal signal for the need for dietary adjustment. A home monitor, it was widely agreed, would facilitate better management through more regular and timely feedback. Despite the facts that obstacles to dietary adherence are multifaceted and that no single intervention would therefore serve as a panacea, a large majority of respondents believed that a home monitor to be an important contributor to the successful management of PKU.

Keywords: Phenylketonuria; dietary management; self-monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I18 I19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, January 2005, Vol 28, pp.639-649

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uta:papers:2004_04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah from University of Utah, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().