Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments

Paolo Silvestri ()

CESMEP Working Papers from University of Turin

Abstract: The paper aims to address the following two questions: what kind of discourse is that which attempt to found or defend the autonomy or the boundaries of a discipline? Why do such discourses tend to turn into normative, dogmatic-excommunicating discourses between disciplines, schools or scholars? I will argue that an adequate answer may be found if we conceive disciplines as dogmatics, where such discourses often take the form of a discourse on the foundation of a discipline, a foundation in the name of which the scholar speaks and with which he/she entertains an identity relationship. To this purpose I will re-examine the methodological discourses of (and debates between)Pareto, Croce and Einaudi on the demarcation issue between philosophy, economics and value-judgments as highly instructive to understand such issues.

Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2015-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.est.unito.it/do/home.pl/Download?doc=/a ... 15dip/wp_33_2015.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments (2017)
Working Paper: Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments (2017)
Working Paper: Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uto:cesmep:201504

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESMEP Working Papers from University of Turin Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laura Ballestra () and Cinzia Carlevaris ().