EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Volatility Forecast Comparison using Imperfect Volatility Proxies

Andrew Patton ()

No 175, Research Paper Series from Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney

Abstract: The use of a conditionally unbiased, but imperfect, volatility proxy can lead to undesirable outcomes in standard methods for comparing conditional variance forecasts. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on functional form of the loss function for the ranking of competing volatility forecasts to be robust to the presence of noise in the volatility proxy, and derive some interesting special cases of this class of “robust” loss functions. We motivate the theory with analytical results on the distortions caused by some widely-used loss functions, when used with standard volatility proxies such as squared returns, the intra-daily range or realised volatility. The methods are illustrated with an application to the volatility of returns on IBM over the period 1993 to 2003.

Keywords: forecast evaluation; forecast comparison; loss functions; realised Variance; range (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C53 C52 C22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-ets and nep-for
Date: 2006-05-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (61) Track citations by RSS feed

Published as: Patton, A., 2011, "Volatility Forecast Comparison using Imperfect Volatility Proxies", Journal of Econometrics, 160(1), 246-256.

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/qfr-archive-02/QFR-rp175.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uts:rpaper:175

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Paper Series from Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Duncan Ford ().

 
Page updated 2019-09-18
Handle: RePEc:uts:rpaper:175