EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Monetary Policy Regimes: a fragile consensus

Peter Howells () and Iris Biefang-Frisancho

No 512, Working Papers from Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol

Abstract: The last fifteen years have seen the emergence of widespread consensus that optimum monetary policy is designed on the basis of three pillars: a short-term official rate of interest as the sole policy instrument and the placing of that instrument in the hands of a central bank which is (a) independent of government and (b) transparent in its decision-making. We take a critical look at each of these. In the first case, we focus attention on the failure of mainstream economics to recognise the choice of instrument and the implications of its adoption. In the case of independence we argue that he theoretical case for independence has been misunderstood and that it is not an essential requirement for successful policy. We also show that ‘independence’ is not best measured against a checklist of statutory characteristics. As regards ‘transparency’ our argument is slightly different, though we come to a similar conclusion. Unlike independence, ‘transparency’ does address a real problem for central banks. However, the evidence suggests that transparency is not the only, or even the best, solution. A variety of evidence tells us that agents can understand and anticipate the actions of the most secretive institutions.

Keywords: Monetary policy; central banks; independence; transparency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E31 E42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2005-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-fmk, nep-mac, nep-mon and nep-pke
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://carecon.org.uk/DPs/0512.pdf First version, 2005 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Monetary Policy Regimes. A Fragile Consensus (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0512

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jo Michell ().

 
Page updated 2025-01-11
Handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0512