What is not so cool about US COOL regulations? A critical analysis of the Appellate Body's ruling on US-COOL

Petros Mavroidis () and Kamal Saggi ()
Additional contact information
Petros Mavroidis: European University Institute

No 13-00016, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers from Vanderbilt University Department of Economics

Abstract: In US-COOL, the Appellate Body (AB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) found that the US measure imposing country of origin labelling (COOL) requirements on livestock of domestic, foreign, and mixed origin was in violation of the obligation to avoid discrimination embedded in Art. 2.1 of the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). We argue that the AB could not and should not have reached this decision based on the information available to it. The AB adopted an erroneous methodology: under its view, the consistency of a measure coming under the purview of the TBT can be examined under Art. 2.1 irrespective of its evaluation under Art. 2.2 thereby making the two obligations distinct. The AB also failed to address the central question raised by this dispute: Does there exist an alternative to COOL that is less trade restrictive? We argue that the over-arching issue in this case should have been to determine what, if anything, the TBT Agreement did to alter or enhance the obligation of non-discrimination that was already embedded in the arsenal of the multilateral trading rules. Unless the AB asks this question in subsequent case law pertaining to the TBT, we risk seeing repetitions of similar mistakes in the future.

JEL-codes: F0 K0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-10-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/VUECON-13-00016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: What is not so Cool about US–COOL Regulations? A critical analysis of the Appellate Body’s ruling on US–COOL (2018)
Journal Article: What is not so Cool about US–COOL Regulations? A critical analysis of the Appellate Body's ruling on US–COOL (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:van:wpaper:vuecon-sub-13-00016

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers from Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().