Multiple Equilibria and the Phillips Curve: Do Agents Always Underreact?

Roberto Casarin, Antonio Peruzzi and Davide Raggi ()
Additional contact information
Roberto Casarin: Ca' Foscari University of Venice
Antonio Peruzzi: Ca' Foscari University of Venice
Davide Raggi: Ca' Foscari University of Venice

No 2025: 10, Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari"

Abstract: We study a New Keynesian Phillips curve in which agents deviate from the rational expectation paradigm and forecast inflation using a simple, potentially misspecified autoregressive rule. Consistency criteria à la Hommes and Zhu (2014) between perceived and actual laws of motion of inflation might allow for multiple expectational equilibria. Unfortunately, multiple equilibria models pose challenges for empirical validation. This paper proposes a latent Markov chain process to dynamically separate such equilibria. Moreover, an original Bayesian inference approach based on hierarchical priors is introduced, which naturally offers the possibility of incorporating equilibrium-identifying constraints with various degrees of prior beliefs. Finally, an inference procedure is proposed to assess a posteriori the probability that the theoretical constraints are satisfied and to estimate the equilibrium changes over time. We show that common prior assumptions regarding structural parameters favor the separation of equilibria, thereby making the Bayesian inference a natural framework for Markov–switching Phillips curve models. Empirical evidence obtained from observed inflation, output gap, and the consensus expectations from the Survey of Professional Forecasters supports multiple equilibria, and we find evidence of temporal variation in over- and under-reaction patterns, which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been previously documented. Specifically, we observe that agents tend to underreact to shocks when inflation is high and persistent, whereas they behave substantially as fully informed forecasters when the inflation level is low and stable, i.e., after the mid–nineties. We also find that the model does not suffer from the missing disinflation puzzle during the Great Recession.

Keywords: Bounded rationality; Markov Switching; Multiple equilibria; Under-reaction; Bayesian methods; Horseshoe hierarchical priors; Survey of Professional Forecasters (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C24 D84 E31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 59 pages
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.unive.it/web/fileadmin/user_upload/dip ... uzzi_raggi_10_25.pdf First version, anno (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ven:wpaper:2025:10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari" Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sassano Sonia ().