Deep Pockets, Extreme Preferences: Explaining Persistent Differences in Electoral Contributions Across Industries
Thomas Bassetti () and
No 04/2014, Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics
When considering contributions to electoral campaigns in the U.S., a puzzling regularity is that some industries tend to spend significantly more than others. To explain this evidence, we present a simple theoretical model in which interest groups finance politicians that require funding for campaign advertising in exchange for policy favors. Our model predicts that interest groups with more extreme preferences will devote a greater amount of resources to campaign financing. The empirical evidence, based on data from the U.S. House elections between 2000 and 2004, strongly supports this finding.
Keywords: Campaign Finance; Interest Groups; Elections; Extreme Preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/wp2014n4.pdf First version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ver:wpaper:04/2014
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Reiter ().