Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-based Investments Products (PRIIP) - Scenari di performance con traiettorie alla Cornish-Fisher
Giulio Aquino (),
Francesco Rossi () and
Matteo Tesser ()
Additional contact information
Giulio Aquino: University of Verona, Department of Economics, Master Degree in Banking and Finance
Francesco Rossi: Department of Economics (University of Verona)
Matteo Tesser: Fairmat Srl, Verona
No 11/2017, Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics
The European Regulation n° 1286 of November 26, 2014 (PRIIPs regulation) will be effective from January 1st 2018 and will oblige products manufactures to produce a three-page document (the Key Investment Document or KID) for several products categories offered to retail investors. In 2020 the KID will also replace the KIID currently compulsory for UCITS funds. One of the key points intro-duced in the new regulatory document is the presence of ex-ante performance scenarios while in the KIID only past performances are represented. In this article, the methodology proposed in the level II of the RTS is analysed and backtested. In par-ticular, the aspect of the European legislator's willingness to quantify the expected returns of invest-ment in four market conditions - stress, unfavourable, moderate and favourable - and two variants of the model proposed by the European Commission were tested and compared with a model based on the simple normality of returns by adopting a backtesting procedure in a time window from 1980 to 2017 on a sample of over 9,000 assets. The work proves that the model proposed by the European Commission for the calculation of perfor-mance scenarios for category 2 PRIIPs (linear products) may not to be considered applicable for those products with a maturity less than one year (e.g. Forward/Future contracts with an underlying ex-change rate and expiration up to six months) when the calculated parameters are such that they do not allow the compliance of the bijectivity of the quantitles distribution function. Furthermore, the results of the backtesting show how the use of Cornish-Fisher's expansion to forecast future performance is compliant with the hypothesis of normality of returns and that between the two proposed variants. We have verified that the variant in which the underlying factors have a zero drift (described in the RTS modification proposals published on November 14th , 2016) is more reliable than the one that foresees a non-zero drift (described by the RTS of June 30th , 2016 and March 8th, 2017).
Keywords: Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-based Investments Products (PRIIP); Cornish-Fisher expansion; backtesting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/wp2017n11.pdf First version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ver:wpaper:11/2017
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Michael Reiter ().