Francesco Andreoli () and
Claudio Zoli ()
No 23/2014, Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics
The analysis of many social phenomena requires to compare distributions of outcomes achieved by individuals belonging to different social groups, defined for instance by their gender, ethnicity, birthplace, education, age or parental background. When the groups are similarly distributed across classes of realizations, their members have equal chances to achieve any of the attainable outcomes. Otherwise, a form of dissimilarity prevails. We frame dissimilarity comparisons of sets of groups distributions by showing the equivalence between axioms underpinning information criteria, majorization conditions, agreement between dissimilarity indicators and new empirical tests based on Zonotopes and Path Polytopes inclusion. Multi-group comparisons of segregation, discrimination and mobility, as well as inequality evaluations, are embedded within the dissimilarity model.
Keywords: Dissimilarity; informativeness; majorization; Zonotopes. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 D30 D63 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/wp2014n23.pdf First version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ver:wpaper:23/2014
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Verona, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Reiter ().