A composite index of the creative economy with application to regional best practices

Harry Bowen (), W. Moesen and Leo Sleuwaegen

Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series from Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School

Abstract: This paper develops a “Composite Index of the Creative Economy” (CICE) for the purpose of benchmarking an entity’s (e.g., country or region) creative capacity as reflected by it’s achievement in three dimensions: Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Openness. To determine the weight each sub-dimension should contribute to the total value of the CICE, we introduce a novel method – endogenous weighting – that allows each entity to have its own unique set of “best” weights. This method addresses the issue of whether an entity’s CICE score value reflects underlying capabilities (or lack thereof) or an “inappropriate” weighting of the underlying dimensions. Our endogenous weight method isolates achievement on the underlying dimensions as the source of a higher or lower CICE score value. In this paper we construct a value of the CICE for each of nine regions: Baden-Württemberg, Catalonia, Flanders, Lombardy, Maryland, Nord-Pas-De-Calais, Quebec, Rhône-Alpes, Scotland. A region’s CICE value indicates its distance from “best practice” and can therefore be used to benchmark a region’s creative capacity relative to other regions. In this respect, a focus of our analysis is the relative creative capacity of Flanders. We also examine the absolute and relative achievement of each region on each of the three underlying dimensions to identify specific areas of strength or weakness. The results indicate that Baden-Württemberg ranks highest in terms of creative capacity while Nord-Pas-De-Calais ranks lowest among the nine regions. Flanders ranks 3rd behind 2nd ranked Maryland. However, Flanders’ rank masks that its CICE score value is 25% below that of Baden-Württemberg and 11% below that of Maryland, indicating a non-trivial gap in creative capacity between Flanders and “best practice.” On the three dimensions underlying creative capacity, Flanders ranks 2nd behind Baden-Württemberg on Innovation and Openness, but ranks 7th on Entrepreneurship (only ahead of Rhône-Alpes and Nord-Pas-De-Calais). Flanders’ relatively poor ranking on Entrepreneurship reflects it’s below average level of achievement on each of the three sub-dimensions of Entrepreneurship (ratio of newly established to existing firms, absence of a fear of failure, and venture capital as a share of GDP). This indicates that fostering and improving conditions for Entrepreneurship remains a challenge for Flanders compared to the other top ranked regions.

Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2006-09-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ent and nep-ino
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vlerick.be/en/2445-VLK/version/default/ ... vlgms-wp-2006-31.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.vlerick.be/en/2445-VLK/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/vlgms-wp-2006-31.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.vlerick.com/en/2445-VLK/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/vlgms-wp-2006-31.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2006-31

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series from Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Isabelle Vandenbroere ().