Is uniformity of investor protection a shot in the arm...or the foot?

Richard Meade

No 375503, Competition & Regulation Times from New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation

Abstract: A growing body of international evidence suggests that thriving capital markets should include protections for minority investors against expropriation by dominant investors. But does this imply that all capital markets should adopt the same protections? And, supposing they did, would that improve the lot of investors? According to Richard Meade, the answers is no.

Date: 2006-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/crt/article/view/3755

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vuw:vuwcrt:375503

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Competition & Regulation Times from New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Library Technology Services ().