A Financial Metric for Comparing Volatility Models: Do Better Models Make Money?

Toby Daglish, John Maheu and Thomas McCurdy

No 19110, Working Paper Series from Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation

Abstract: This paper proposes a fully-specified equilibrium approach which provides both financial and utility metrics for comparing alternative beliefs about the conditional distribution of a stock price. In this paper we focus on differences in volatility dynamics which are inputs to investors' assessments of a derivative security. We construct equilibria in which different investors (models) trade a derivative that is sensitive to the volatility of the underlying asset. Our approach can be used to assess the economic importance of parameter uncertainty and model misspecification. Examples using simulated data demonstrate that informed investors (investors with better models) make money and utility gains against uninformed investors. Parameter uncertainty and model uncertainty in general both lead to lower profits. Using historical data we find that GARCH models make significant gains against constant and exponentially weighted moving average specifications of volatility.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19110

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vuw:vuwcsr:19110

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation ISCR, PO Box 600, Victoria University Wellington 6140, New Zealand. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Library Technology Services ().