Luck Egalitarianism, Relational Egalitarianism, and the Harshness Objection: Experimental Approach

Akira Inoue (), Kazumi Shimizu, Daisuke Udagawa () and Yoshiki Wakamatsu ()
Additional contact information
Akira Inoue: Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo
Daisuke Udagawa: Faculty of Economics, Hannan University
Yoshiki Wakamatsu: Gakushuin University Law School

No 1720, Working Papers from Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics

Abstract: Elizabeth Anderson accused luck egalitarianism of having harshness implications when it is adopted as a redistributive policy. Anderson supported democratic or relational egalitarianism that requires the satisfaction of basic capabilities for democratic relationships among citizens, regardless of their responsibility for their current positions. Subsequently, there has been a debate over luck egalitarianism and relational egalitarianism; however, these positions are fairly close by virtue of their reliance on our intuitions, a fact that Anderson's original arguments echo. This paper thus examines Anderson's arguments against luck egalitarianism and for democratic egalitarianism using an online survey method. The results show that, first, for ordinary people, the luck consideration is as important as the basic capabilities consideration. This finding runs contrary to Anderson's claim. Second, while real people consider the degree of compensation through the factors of causality (the degree of chosen results) and responsibility (the degree of responsibility for the consequences), the lack of basic capabilities directs them to determine how much victims of bad luck should be compensated. This suggests that the effort to reconcile luck egalitarianism and relational egalitarianism is on the right track. These findings are relevant to the recent shift of egalitarian philosophy.

Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2017-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.waseda.jp/fpse/winpec/assets/uploads/2014/05/No.E1720.pdf First version, (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wap:wpaper:1720

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haruko Noguchi ().