Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: contingent claims versus dynamic programming

Margaret Insley and Tony Wirjanto ()

No 8002, Working Papers from University of Waterloo, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper compares two well-known approaches for valuing a risky investment using real options theory: contingent claims (CC) with risk neutral valuation and dynamic programming (DP) using a constant risk adjusted discount rate. Both approaches have been used in valuing forest assets. A proof is presented which shows that, except under certain restrictive assumptions; DP using a constant discount rate and CC will not yield the same answers for investment value. A few special cases are considered for which CC and DP with a constant discount rate are consistent with each other. An optimal tree harvesting example is presented to illustrate that the values obtained using the two approaches can differ whcn we depart from these special cases to a more realistic scenariio. Further, the implied risk adjusted discount rate calculated from CC is found to vary with the stochastic state variable and stand age. We conclude that for real options problems the CC approach should be used.

Keywords: optimal tree harvesting; real options; contingent claims; dynamic programming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://economics.uwaterloo.ca/documents/InsleyWirjantoRealOptionValues.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Journal Article: Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: Contingent claims versus dynamic programming (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wat:wpaper:08002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Waterloo, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sherri Anne Arsenault ().