 Explaining Pakistan's high growth performance over the past two decades: can it be sustained ?Sadiq Ahmed No 1341, Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank Abstract: Using standard statistical growth analysis, the author shows that Pakistan's growth is the result of: (a) rapid capital accumulation. Pakistan's investment rate was relatively low but its fixed investment rate grew steadily in the 1970s, stabilizing at about 17 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the mid-1980s; (b) growth of the labor force, which offset a tendency toward capital intensity of production; (c) more competition from external trade; and, (d) a policy of economic liberalization since 1978. Pakistan was able to sustain high growth and avoid a financial crisis - despite large deficits - because real interest rates on debts were substantially negative in the 1970s, so debt-to-GDP ratios continued to decline. But real interest rates turned positive in the 1980s. If Pakistan continues to have fiscal deficits of the same magnitude as in the past, a financial crisis will quickly emerge. Pakistan cannot avoid a debt crisis by creating money. Higher inflation will hurt resource allocation and income distribution. To guard against reduced growth, weakened export performance, and higher real interest rates, Pakistan should reduce its fiscal deficit to below 4.5-5 percent of GDP and phase out quasi-fiscal deficits. Pakistan needs more balanced use of fiscal, monetary and exchange rate policies. Putting the burden of external adjustment fully on the real exchange rate, as Pakistan tried to do in the past, is inconsistent with improvements in external balance. Real exchange rate depreciation imposes capital losses on the stock of external debt. The real exchange rate should be set at an appropriate level, and monetary and fiscal policies should be used to adjust demand. A substantial adjustment effort will be needed to increase domestic savings and investment rates. National savings should increase from 14 percent of GDP to 20-22 percent of GDP. Raising public revenues and reducing public investment should focus on areas (such as physical infrastructure and human development) that promote private investment, economic growth, and equity. To contain the fiscal cost of domestic borrowing, Pakistan has pursued a policy of financial repression, which has repressed the private credit and investment needed for long-term growth. Also needed is more rapid progress in human capital development, especially investments in women's health and education. To complete internationally in manufacturing requires more skilled production and a better educated workforce than Pakistan has had. Keywords: Environmental Economics&Policies; Achieving Shared Growth; Economic Theory&Research; Economic Growth; Banks&Banking Reform (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1341 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to econpapers@oru.se.
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.