Barter in Russia: Liquidity Shortage versus Lack of Restructuring

Sophie Brana and Mathilde Maurel

No 271, William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series from William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan

Abstract: The rapid growth of barter is one of the most surprising phenomena in Russia: As a percentage of industrial sales it steadily increased from 5% in 1992 to nearly 55% in 1998. Unknown in CEEC's transition countries, barter is only one aspect of the Russian economy's demonetisation [process, along with dollarisation, growing arrears, and the widespread use of veksels and offsets. Barter is often seen as the consequence of the lack of restructuring, but some authors argue that it is a mechanism used to avoid shutting down potentially viable firms, in a context of market imperfections. The implications differ depending on the analysis chosen: in the first case, an expansionary monetary policy might not be appropriate, while the contrary is true if the demonetisation process jeopardizes potentially good enterprises. This paper aims to assess this phenomenon in the Russian economy. The paper's main contribution to work in this field (reviewed and documented in section II) is to highlight two different rationales for barter. Before studying the latter more closely, section III uses official monthly data collected by the central bank of Russia, the Goskomstat, and the Russian Economic Barometer (REB), to emphasize the macro-economic features of barter in Russia, and, more specifically, the link between monetary policy and bartering activity. It appears that macroeconomic policy and macroeconomic indicators are unable to explain the whole process. In section IV, quarterly statistics for 1995 and 1996 taken from the REB survey of roughly 200 firms make it possible to implement a more qualitative survey. The conclusion is striking: barter is used by potentially viable firms as a way of avoiding closure, while at the same time financing increasing inventories and soft goods in the case of indebted firms who use barter transactions, bank credit and choose to accumulate arrers in order to avoid restructuring.

Keywords: barter; non-monetary transactions; virtual economy; Russia; transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C23 E5 P2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: pages
Date: 1999-06-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp271.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp271.pdf [302 Found]--> https://wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp271.pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Barter in Russia: Liquidity Shortage Versus Lack of Restructuring (1999)
Working Paper: Barter in Russia: Liquidity Shortage Versus Lack of Restructuring (1999)
Working Paper: Barter in Russia: Liquidity Shortage Versus Lack of Restructuring (1999)
Working Paper: Barter in Russia: Liquidity Shortage Versus Lack of Restructuring (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wdi:papers:1999-271

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series from William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 724 E. University Ave, Wyly Hall 1st Flr, Ann Arbor MI 48109. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by WDI ().