Windfalls and work requirements: Evidence from a field experiment in Malawi
Kate Ambler () and
No 2019-25, Department of Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics, Williams College
Though the differential impacts of earned and unearned income have long been of interest to economists and policymakers, the study of this question is often conflated by other differences between the income streams. We conduct a field experiment in Malawi in which we exaimine the differential short-term effect of earned and unearned income on the allocation of expenditures and labor supply, holding all other factors constant. All participants receive an equal size cash payment and make the same time investment; half are required to work, and half are not. We find little evidence that income source affects the allocation of expenditures across categories, but do find that the work requirement increases overall expenditures immediately following the payment. Conversely, the work requirement results in a reallocation of labor supply away from household work in the very short term.
Keywords: Labor Supply; Agriculture; Malawi (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://web.williams.edu/Economics/wp/amblergodlon ... uirementsDec2019.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wil:wileco:2019-25
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
The price is Free.
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Department of Economics Working Papers from Department of Economics, Williams College Williamstown, MA 01267. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stephen Sheppard ().