Social Comparison of Abilities at an Elite College: Feeling Outclassed with 1350 SATs

George Goethals and Matthew Kugler

No DP-70, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education from Department of Economics, Williams College

Abstract: Two studies explored the experience and performance of students at Williams College in three-person groups that were homogeneous or heterogeneous in rated academic ability. In accord with hypotheses from Festinger’s (1954) social comparison theory, students in academically homogeneous groups had more positive experiences and performed better on measures of written and video-taped performance. These results differ somewhat from recent studies of peer effects among roommates and from a line of recent social comparison research regarding the effect of exposure to superior others on one’s own performance. In addition, students in single-sex groups had higher scores on several self-report and performance measures. Qualifying this finding were additional results showing that women did better in single-sex, while men did better in mixed-sex groups. The overall results were framed in terms of social comparison dynamics.

Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2006-02
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://sites.williams.edu/wpehe/files/2011/06/DP-70.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wil:wilehe:70

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

The price is Free.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education from Department of Economics, Williams College Williamstown, MA 01267. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Greg Phelan ().