University Efficiency: A Comparison of Results from Stochastic and Non-Stochastic Methods

W. Chan M.L. McMillan ()
Additional contact information
W. Chan M.L. McMillan: Wilfrid Laurier University, https://www.wlu.ca/academics/faculties/lazaridis-school-of-business-and-economics/faculty-profiles/wing-hong-chan/index.html
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Wing Hong Chan () and Melville McMillan

Working Papers from Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Efficiency scores are determined for Canadian universities using both Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier (SF) methods for selected specifications. The scores are compared. Although there is some consistency, there is also considerable divergence in the efficiency scores and their rankings. Besides choice of the DEA or SF method, scores are sensitive to the definition of output, the inclusion of environmental (i.e., primarily firm-specific) factors, and the procedures for their inclusion (one-stage and two-stage methods). Despite the divergence among methods and specifications noted, the relative positions of individual universities across sets of several efficiency rankings (e.g., all the DEA and SF outcomes) demonstrate consistency. An analysis of rankings provides a range of potential rankings for each university. High and low efficiency groups are evidenced but the rank for most universities is not significantly different from that of many others. The results indicate that, while efficiency analysis can be helpful, decision makers need to be very cautious when employing efficiency scores for management and policy purposes and they recommend looking for confirmation of the usual efficiency analysis.

Keywords: tuition fees; enrollment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005, Revised 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://web.wlu.ca/repec/Working%20papers/2003/McMillan%20and%20Chan%202003.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wlu:wpaper:eg0040

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Glen Stewart ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).