 The Effects of Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit FunctionJalal Akhavein (), Allen Berger () and David B. Humphrey Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers from Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania Abstract: The recent waves of large mergers and acquisitions in both manufacturing and service industries in the United States raise important questions concerning the public policy tradeoffs between possible gains in operating efficiency versus possible social efficiency losses from a greater exercise of market power. The answers largely depend upon the source of increased operating profits (if nay) from consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions could raise profits in any of three major ways. First, they could improve cost efficiency, reducing costs per unit of output for a given set of output quantities and input prices. Consultants and mangers have often justified large mergers on the basis of expected cost efficiency gains.
Second, mergers may increase profits through improvements in profit efficiency that involve superior combinations of inputs and outputs. Profit efficiency is a more inclusive concept than cost efficiency, because it takes into account the cost and revenue effects of the choice of the output vector, which is taken as given in the measurement of cost efficiency. Thus, a merger could improve profit efficiency without improving cost efficiency if the reconfiguration of outputs associated with the merger increases revenues more than it increases costs, or if it reduces costs more than it reduces revenues. The authors argue that analysis of profit efficiency is moe appropriate for the evaluation of mergers than cost efficiency because outputs typically do change substantially subsequent to a merger.
Third, mergers may improve profits through the exercise of additional market power in setting prices. An increase in market concentration or market share may allow the consolidated firm to charge higher rates for the good or services it products, raising profits by extracting more surplus from consumers, with any improvement in efficiency.
The authors believe that the academic literature has made little progress in determining the sources of profitability gains, if any, associated with bank mergers. Of the three main sources of potential profitability gains, the literature has focused primarily on cost efficiency improvements. The empirical evidence suggests that mergers have had very little effect on cost efficiency on average. Moreover, there has also been little progress in divining any ex ante conditions that accurately predict the changes in cost efficiency that do occur for possible use in antitrust policy. Similarly, there are very few academic studies of which the authors are aware of the changes in prices associated with bank mergers. This is surprising, given that a major thrust of current antitrust enforcement is to prevent mergers which are expected to result in prices less favorable to consumers or to require divestitures that accomplish this goal.
The authors findings suggest that the banking megamergers of the 1980s did significantly improve profit efficiency on average. The average profit efficiency rank of merging banks increased from the 74th percentile to the 90th percentile of the peer group of large banks with complete data available over the same time intervals, a statistically significant 16 percentage point increase. Use of profit efficiency levels, rather than ranks, indicated similar improvements. This main result also was robust to the alternative 'nonstandard' specification of the profit function which likely removes any scale or merger biases from the analysis. The authors suggest that the reason for the different findings is quite simple. Measured cost efficiency changes do not take into account the effects of the changes in output that occur after the merger, whereas measured profit efficiency changes include all the cost efficiency changes plays the cost and revenue effects of changes in output that typically occur after a merger.
The authors suggest that their results may not necessarily generalize to mergers other than the banking megamergers of the 1980s that make up the data set. It is possible that greater cost efficiency gains maybe present in other industries or in bank mergers of the 1990s because of an increased focus on cost savings in the current decade. Similarly, there may be more market power effects on prices in mergers of smaller banks, which tend to occur in more concentrated local markets. Date: 1996-01 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wop:pennin:96-03 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers from Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.