Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways
Antonio Estache,
Andrea Goldstein and
Russell Pittman
Development and Comp Systems from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
A variety of proposals for creating more competition within the railroad sector and in the broader freight transport sector are under consideration in countries throughout the world. Brazil, though something of a latecomer to wider infrastructure reform, has recently taken large steps in restructuring its railroad system. This paper analyzes Brazil's ongoing railroad reforms, seeking to place them in the context both of the broader reform project going on in Brazil and of railroad reforms taking place in developing and developed countries worldwide.
Keywords: railway; privatization; regulatory reform; restructuring; Brazil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L51 L92 O14 O17 R48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
Date: 2001-11-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lam and nep-reg
Note: Type of Document - WordPerfect; prepared on PC; pages: 29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0111/0111001.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0111/0111001.ps.gz (application/postscript)
Related works:
Journal Article: Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways (2001) 
Working Paper: Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0111001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Development and Comp Systems from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).